As turboprop and jet aircraft climb or descend under certain
atmospheric conditions, they can inadvertently seed mid-level clouds and
cause narrow bands of snow or rain to develop and fall to the ground,
new research finds. Through this seeding process, they leave behind
odd-shaped holes or channels in the clouds, which have long fascinated
the public.
The key ingredient for developing these holes in the clouds: water
droplets at subfreezing temperatures, below about 5 degrees Fahrenheit
(-15 degrees Celsius). As air is cooled behind aircraft propellers or
over jet wings, the water droplets freeze and drop toward Earth.
“Any time aircraft fly through these specific conditions, they are
altering the clouds in a way that can result in enhanced precipitation
nearby,” says Andrew Heymsfield, a scientist with the National Center
for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and lead author of a new study into the
phenomenon. “Just by flying an airplane through these clouds, you could
produce as much precipitation as with seeding materials along the same
path in the cloud.”
Precipitation from planes may be particularly common in regions such as
the Pacific Northwest and western Europe because of the frequent
occurrence of cloud layers with supercooled droplets, Heymsfield says.
The study, which addresses longstanding questions about unusual cloud
formations known as hole-punch and canal clouds, is being published this
month in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. It was
funded by the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s sponsor. In addition
to NCAR, the research team included scientists from Colorado State
University and the University of Wyoming, as well as a retired cloud
physicist.
-----Punching holes in clouds-----
Across the world, sightings of blue-sky holes piercing a cloud layer
have triggered bemusement and speculation. A front-page feature on
Yahoo! carried the headline “A Halo over Moscow” after photos emerged of
just such a hole in October 2009.
As far back as the 1940s, scientists have wondered about the causes of
these clouds with gaps seemingly made by a giant hole punch. Researchers
have proposed a number of possible aviation-related causes, from
acoustic shock waves produced by jets, to local warming of the air along
a jet’s path, to the formation of ice along jet contrails. Indeed, the
earliest observations implicated jet aircraft, but not propeller
aircraft, as producing the holes.
Researchers in the 1980s observed that propeller aircraft could
transform supercooled droplets into ice crystals, and experiments were
launched in the 1990s to characterize the phenomenon.
But scientists had not previously observed snow as it fell to the ground
as a result of aircraft until Heymsfield and his colleagues happened to
fly through some falling snow west of Denver International Airport with
an array of instruments. While the research team did not notice anything
unusual at the time of their 2007 flight, a subsequent review of data
from a ground-based radar in the area revealed an unusual echo,
indicating that the band of precipitation had evolved quickly and was
unusually shaped.
“It became apparent that the echo had evolved in a unique way, but I had
no satisfactory explanation,” says Patrick Kennedy, a Colorado State
University radar engineer who spotted the unusual readings and helped
write the study.
-----Piecing together clues-----
Heymsfield and Kennedy went back through data from their aircraft’s
forward- and downward-viewing camera. They noticed a hole in an
otherwise-solid deck of altocumulus clouds in the forward imagery, as
well as a burst of snow that extended to the ground.
Since the hole was oriented in the same direction as the standard flight
tracks of commercial aircraft in the region, Heymsfield surmised that a
plane flying through the cloud might have somehow caused ice particles
to form and “snow out” along its path, leaving a canal-shaped hole-punch
cloud behind.
A subsequent review of flight track records from the Federal Aviation
Administration revealed that turboprop planes operated by two airlines
flew close to the hole-punch location, following a standard flight path
that produced the subsequent band of snow. Snow crystals began falling
about five minutes after the second aircraft flew through the cloud. The
snowfall, in a band about 20 miles long and 2.5 miles wide, continued
for about 45 minutes, resulting in about two inches of snow on the ground.
The researchers also examined data from onboard spectrometers that
profiled the snowflakes within the band of snow beneath the hole punch.
These plate-shaped crystals showed evidence of riming (accumulation of
liquid water), whereas ice particles elsewhere in the cloud showed
little or no riming.
“This tells us that the aircraft literally ‘seeded’ the cloud just by
flying through it,” Heymsfield says.
The cloud layers outside Denver contained supercooled droplet--particles
of water that remain liquid even at temperatures as low as -35 degrees
Fahrenheit (about -34 degrees C). When a turboprop plane flies through
such a cloud layer, the tips of its propellers can cause the air to
rapidly expand. As the air expands, it cools and causes the supercooled
droplets to freeze into ice particles and fall out of the clouds as snow
or rain.
The research team conducted additional studies into the cooling over the
wings of jet aircraft, thereby accounting for earlier observations of
the impact of jets. Jet aircraft need colder temperatures (below about
-4 to -13 degrees F, or -20 to -25 degrees C) to generate the seeding
effect. Air forced to expand over the wings as the aircraft moves
forward cools and freezes the cloud droplets.
“This apparently happens frequently, embedded in the cloud layers,”
Heymsfield says. “You wouldn’t necessarily see it from satellite or from
the ground. I had no idea this was happening. I was sitting in back of
the plane. And then this data set just fell in our laps. It was a lucky
break.”
The University Corporation for Atmospheric Research manages the National
Center for Atmospheric Research under sponsorship by the National
Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or
recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science
Foundation or the Department of Energy.
No comments:
Post a Comment